Recent Discussions

8 Dec 2003 - 10:39pm
0
Dave Malouf
2005

Fwd: [experiencedesign] Fortune December 8, 2003

--- Paula Thornton <paula.thornton at iknovate.com>
wrote:
> To: <experiencedesign at yahoogroups.com>
> From: "Paula Thornton" <paula.thornton at iknovate.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:55:18 -0800
> Subject: [experiencedesign] Fortune Dece

8 Dec 2003 - 5:14pm
0
hans samuelson
2003

RE: Beauty and Transparency

For those who may not be familiar with it, there is an interesting body
of research at Caroline Hummels' site at Delft.
http://studiolab.io.tudelft.nl/hummels/research
Her work centers around the question of interactive aesthetics, which
butts up quite rapidly against questions of interaction and beauty in
general.

For example, the 2000 text "Actions speak louder than words: shifting
from buttons and icons to aesthetics of interaction" (scroll down her
publications list a little) offers five criteria for evaluating

8 Dec 2003 - 11:52am
0
gleija at comca...
2003

ADMIN: attachments (was RE: Beauty and Transparency)

Thanks for the clarification.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
/G
> Before people respond too loudly about the message just sent w/ the
> attachments, I want to intercede.
>
> 1. there has been no prohibition made about attachments.
> 2. the latest e-mail was really the first non-text attachments sent and
> confirms what I feared that the system is horible with them.
> 3.

8 Dec 2003 - 11:45am
0
Greg Petroff
2004

2020 show and kinex

I saw it and thought they totally missed the point.
Kinex is a really great set of toys for people who
enjoy building things. The purpose of the toy is its
"complicated" assembly of the pieces and not the final
thing that it can do. Kinex is really something that
is a "hobbyist" toy and the user experience is the
building of it not the final product.

8 Dec 2003 - 11:32am
0
Dave Malouf
2005

ADMIN: attachments (was RE: Beauty and Transparency)

Before people respond too loudly about the message just sent w/ the
attachments, I want to intercede.

1. there has been no prohibition made about attachments.
2. the latest e-mail was really the first non-text attachments sent and
confirms what I feared that the system is horible with them.
3.

8 Dec 2003 - 11:21am
0
10 years ago
1 reply
gleija at comca...
2003

Beauty and Transparency

I put together some bits and pieces related to our discussion of beauty and transparency.

Transparency
When we say transparent, do we mean invisible, as in Donald Norman's example
below?

"You use computers when you use many modern automobiles, microwave ovens, games, CD players and calculators. You don't notice the computer because you think of yourself as doing the task, not as using the computer." ["The Design of Everyday Things", New York, Doubleday, 1989, p. 185].

Beauty
Here are a few definitions of beauty I found:

1.

8 Dec 2003 - 10:46am
0
Janet M. Six
2003

20/20 Segment

Hi,

What did everyone think about the 20/20 segment on assembling toys
and the posted responses on abcnews.com? (There is a nice summary of
the story at the 20/20 website if you missed it.)

I thought the segment was interesting and a good step in educating
the public that the consequences of bad design are not their fault. I
really believe that the K'Nex representative really thinks that a
frustrated public would contact them about assembly issues. We have so
much PR work (as a field) to do!!

5 Dec 2003 - 8:41pm
0
Victor Lombardi
2003

Re: YADQ (Yet Another Design quote)...

Tom Peters' new book, which itself is heavily
designed, makes design one of its main themes:

Design, the ultimate edge
In the world of Tom Peters, design is so critical that
it should be on the agenda (along with a professional
designer) of every meeting in every single department.
Design, like lifestyle, is one of the few
differentiating factors, and companies that ignore the
power of elegant and functional design will lose.

5 Dec 2003 - 2:12pm
0
Michael Quibuyen
2003

XP: Extreme Programming &amp; Product Usability

They don't fit in. :)

Here's why:

XP relies on a "customer" to decide which features should be implemented
and when. A "customer" may be a product/project manager, customer service
employee, a marketing resource, etc.

5 Dec 2003 - 1:51pm
0
Don_Hanson at N...
2003

XP & Usability

We've been doing Agile Programming with large parts of eXtreme
Programming (the degree of the difference has a holy war status for some
folks) with a focus on usability.

Usability components include: UI prototype which was created at the
start of the project, and has evolved over the course of things. It is
reviewed internally and by Joint Development Partners (similar to XP
customers, but story selection is controlled by an internal person).
The prototype is maintained by our usability expert.

Syndicate content Get the feed