I was at the Accessibility 2.0 conference in London yesterday and came
across some confusion over personas and accessibility. I've written a
short blog on the topic at http://www.syntagm.co.uk/design/blog/?p=89
Design for Usability
US Toll Free 1-866-SYNTAGM
mailto:william.hudson at syntagm.co.uk
<mailto:william.hudson at syntagm.co.uk>
Syntagm is a limited company registered in England and Wales (1985).
Registered number: 1895345. Registered office: 10 Oxford Road, Abingdon
Courses in card sorting and Ajax interaction design - Las Vegas and
Thanks a lot :) I´m very amateur with personas, but I find them very
useful! There is a lot of people who is against personas because they
feel like that isn´t "real", and she/he won´t behave like a real
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
In my opinion, each persona should represent an audience group for the
website distinguishable by different sets of needs from your site. So,
for example, someone interested in volunteering has different needs
that someone looking for a news update. That being said, someone with
a disability isn't likely to have different needs than anyone else.
The way they access the information may be different, but their
ultimate needs should integrate with the other personas.
Accessibility should just be inherent in the design process.