simplicity

12 Sep 2010 - 3:51pm
0
4 years ago
19 replies
uxmovement
2010

Simplicity is Not Overrated, Just Misunderstood

This article is a response to Don Norman's column article from Interactions Magazine. The article disproves Norman's point that simplicity is highly overrated and that users only buy products based on complexity and features, and provides a more accurate and substantial point of view.

read the article ยป Simplicity is Not Overrated, Just Misunderstood

30 Oct 2008 - 4:57pm
0
6 years ago
27 replies
Ali Naqvi
2008

Is simplicity the answer? I am with John Maeda on this one.

I recently read John Maeda's book 'The Laws of Simplicity' and also visit
his website http://lawsofsimplicity.com/
The Laws of Simplicity is a book written in the same style Don Norman
wrote 'The Design of Future Things'.
Few days back I came across the following link
http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/simplicity_is_not_th.html wherein my Guru states
that Simplicity is NOT The answer.
My Guru states that 'I conclude that the entire argument between features
and simplicity is misguided.

9 Apr 2007 - 11:16am
0
7 years ago
3 replies
Terms:
Mark Schraad
2006

Simplicity (misinformation)

This conversation has one foot in design, another in engineering and yet a third in marketing.

Simplicity is about the usage of the product. It effects the user. Complexity as present here, the 'amount' of features is about the purchaser. These may or may not be the same person, but they definitely have different perspectives and the criteria for purchase and usage are different.

These are very different contexts. The reason that users buy a particular product is for the benefits (pardon my marketing hat).

8 Apr 2007 - 9:50pm
0
7 years ago
15 replies
Dave Malouf
2005

Simplicity (again)

http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/NussbaumOnDesign/archives/2007/04/simplicity_ease.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_nussbaumondesign

What do people think about Nussbaum's equation of simplicity with
reduced features? I think he is pretty off the mark here.

-- dave

--
David Malouf
http://synapticburn.com/
http://ixda.org/
http://motorola.com/

18 Jan 2007 - 2:27am
0
7 years ago
32 replies
Esteban Barahona
2006

Simplicity is Not Understood

note: this is a draft sour/sober personal opinion. it's not directed to
anyone in particular, really. don't take it too seriously if you don't want.
It doesn't have to do with IxD (wtf is IxD? really? is it
ProductDesign+HCI+Psychology+ScienceOfMind? who cares, IxD is a brand to
have more cash)... w/e

I "hate" to do this, talk in first person about this issues. but enough is
enough...

8 Dec 2006 - 1:36am
0
Terms:
Brian Forte
2004

Complexity verus simplicity

Gentlefolk,

Josh Evnin wrote:
>I'm assuming "software like that" means software that you can buy
>that offers the simplest needed funtionality, but that you can also
>extend to have more personalized features.

7 Dec 2006 - 11:31am
0
8 years ago
7 replies
Terms:
John Schrag
2005

Complexity verus simplicity ( WAS: Motorola Motofone User Experience)

I wrote:
> ...I'd love to be able to find a
> cell phone that isn't burdened down (and made too complex) by hosts of

> features I neither want nor need nor use.

Josh Viney replied:
>...why build a phone that has to be a pure phone and can never be more
> than that? Why not build a phone that starts off as a simple phone,
but
> can grow with users as they demand more functionality?...

I love that idea. One thing I've always hated about software is the
unending feature creep.

2 Sep 2006 - 1:44pm
0
8 years ago
6 replies
Terms:
Dave Malouf
2005

John Maeda's Laws of Simplicity

http://weblogs.media.mit.edu/SIMPLICITY/
John Maeda's blog on Simplicity ... but more is being done at his book
blog at http://lawsofsimplicity.com/

Oh! I came across all this reading a silly article in Wired. the article
isn't online yet, but they ask John to apply his laws to a new Sony DV
Cam.

Syndicate content Get the feed